Tindallgrams

There were some things about the terminal descent on the last mission that kind of spooked a lot of people. One of the things suggested as a result of this was to add a capability to the LM guidance and control system which would assist the crew during the last 100 feet or so of the descent. Specifically, fix the PGNCS so that it will provide an automatic nulling of the horizontal velocity while the crew controls the descent rate with the ROD switch.

This suggestion was made in mid-December after the Apollo 13 LM computer flight ropes modules had been manufactured. Therefore it was desirable to constrain this change to a single module and, of course the formulation, coding and verification had to be carried out very quickly. Actually the program release was accomplished in early January for Raytheon to make a new module No. 5. The plan was to finish all necessary testing and analysis after that release and, if anything were found making it non-flight worthy, we would fall back and use the original module which essentially provides the Apollo 11 and 12 capability.

Since that time the crew has really fallen for the horizontal velocity nulling feature but, unfortunately, MIT has discovered problems in the formulation which make the program unacceptable for flight. Specifically the computer cycle time is exceeded, or nearly so; the consequence of which is violent throttle commands either up or down completely without warning.

MIT has reworked the program to avoid this unacceptable feature and claims to have thoroughly tested it. Eyeball examination by other experts (MSC and TRW) and FMES testing at Grumman have revealed nothing questionable about it. MIT strongly advised making a new revised module 5.

The question resolves to which is the greater risk - a new “immature” program which may contain undiscovered deficiencies vs. a flight without automatic horizontal nulling. A toss-up.

Mr. Kraft broke (shattered?) the tie by voting for making the new module and the tape was released to Raytheon the morning of February 5. Rope delivery to KSC is now scheduled for March 10, 1970, which means the original module must be used during the FRT now planned on February 18, 1970. However, the module will be instilled prior to CDDT, which is currently scheduled for March 19, 1970.

And, of course we’ll use it unless something is discovered between now and then to prevent it. Testing, of course, continues at a rapid pace; the crew, on the other hand, is training to get along without it if they must.

Terms & Abbreviations

CDDT

Countdown Demonstration Test.

FMES

Full Mission Engineering Simulator.

KSC

Kennedy Space Center.

LM

Lunar Module. Earlier it was known as the Lunar Excursion Module and abbreviated “LEM.” Even after the name change, it continued to be pronounced “lem.”

MIT

Massachussets Institute of Technology. In these memos, MIT is shorthand for the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory, created and led by avionics pioneer Charles Stark Draper. It is now known as the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory and became independent of MIT in 1973.

MSC

Manned Spacecraft Center. Now known as Johnson Space Center.

PGNCS

Primary Guidance, Navigation and Control System (pronounced “pings”). The inertial guidance system in both the Command Module and the Lunar Module.

ROD

Rate of Descent. The guidance computer controlled the rate at which the lunar module descended and held it steady while landing. The ROD switch allowed the pilot to increase or decrease this rate by clicking the switch up (to decrease it) or down (to increase it).